|
346245269
|
0111500
|
2022-09-23
|
229 CHURCH STREET, NAUGATUCK, CT, 06770
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2022-09-23
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2022-10-13
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Complaint |
| Activity Nr |
1949569 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
|
|
342733318
|
0112000
|
2017-10-27
|
25 LINCOLN AVENUE, BRISTOL, CT, 06010
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-10-27
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2018-05-24
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1273340 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B10 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-11-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4183.0 |
| Contest Date |
2017-12-22 |
| Final Order |
2018-05-07 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of amonitoring system. On or about 10/27/2017 employees at the O'Brien Funeral Home roofing project were exposed to approximately 12' falls. Employees were engaged in roofing activities without fall protection. |
|
|
|
342308293
|
0112000
|
2017-05-08
|
881 FARMINGTON AVENUE, BRISTOL, CT, 06010
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-05-08
|
| Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2018-12-17
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260416 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
3346.2 |
| Initial Penalty |
5577.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
12 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: On or about 05/08/2017 and 05/09/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, employees were working at and near live electrical power lines with no guarding or any other protective system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 III |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
2390.4 |
| Initial Penalty |
3984.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
12 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iii): The safety monitor was not on the same walking/working surface and within visual sighting distance of the employee being monitored. On or about 05/08/2017 and 05/09/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, the Safety Monitor did not keep the employees in visual sight while employees were exposed to 17 foot fall hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 V |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
12 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function: On or about 05/08/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, the safety monitor was installing EPDM roofing membrane to the curb of a unit as well as performing other work and was not monitoring the employees exposed to fall hazards at height over 17 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261051 A |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Current Penalty |
1434.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2390.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: On or about 05/08/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, employees were using the lower roof to access the upper roof and the break in elevation was approximately 46 inches. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Current Penalty |
1434.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2390.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about 05/08/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, employees were using an extension ladder to access the rear lower roof and the ladder did not extend 3 feet past the roof deck. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-07-10 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-08-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-07-24 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: On or about 05/09/2017 at the Frank's Service Station Re-Roofing Project, employees were using a step ladder in the closed position to access and descend to and from the main roof deck. |
|
|
|
342228376
|
0111500
|
2017-04-05
|
1150 WHALEY AVENUE, NEW HAVEN, CT, 06515
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-04-05
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-05-10
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260404 F06 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-04-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-05-26 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous Jobsite: The attachment plug of the extension cord used to supply power to the hand tools used during the roofing work was missing the grounding pin. |
|
|
|
338154628
|
0112000
|
2013-01-09
|
42 CENTURY DRIVE, BRISTOL, CT, 06010
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2013-01-09
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, P: CTARGET
|
| Case Closed |
2013-06-13
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
815323 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
815421 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-03-12 |
| Final Order |
2013-06-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about 01/09/2013 at the Doubletree Hotel renovation project, the employees were not trained on fall protection requirements and usage of fall protection while working on an ice covered roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260150 C01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1320.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-03-12 |
| Final Order |
2013-06-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(i): Travel distance from any point of the protected area to the nearest fire extinguisher exceeded 100 feet: On or about 01/09/2013 at the Doubletree Hotel renovation project, employees were working on a roof using a torch, propane, and flammable roof adhesive and the nearest fire extinguisher was located on the ground in the company truck located approximately 250 feet travel distance, to and from. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260150 C01 VI |
| Issuance Date |
2013-03-04 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-03-12 |
| Final Order |
2013-06-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.150(c)(1)(vi): A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 10B, was not provided within 50 feet of wherever more than 5 gallons of flammable or combustible liquids or 5 pounds of flammable gas are being used on the jobsite. This requirement does not apply to the integral fuel tanks of motor vehicles. On or about 01/09/2013 at the Doubletree Hotel renovation project, employees were using a 20 pound rated propane tank and 3 gallons of flammable QuickPrime Plus adhesive on a roof with no fire extinguisher within 50 feet. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260021 B05 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-04-16 |
| Current Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-03-12 |
| Final Order |
2013-06-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(5): Employee(s) required to handle or use flammable liquids, gases, or toxic materials were not instructed in the safe handling and use of these materials and made aware of the specific requirements contained in 29 CFR 1926, subparts D, F, and other applicable subparts of this part. On or about 01/09/2013 at the Doubletree Hotel renovation project, employees were exposed to fire hazards while working with flammable liquids/gas such as QuickPrime Plus adhesives and propane. The employees did not know the fire extinguisher requirements or of not working within 50 feet of flammables while using a torch. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Contest Date |
2013-03-12 |
| Final Order |
2013-06-13 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1): The employer did not did not designate a competent person to monitor the safety of other employees and/or did not ensure that the safety monitor complied with the requirements listed in (h)(1)(i) through (h)(1)(v) of this section: On or about 01/09/2013 at the Doubletree Hotel renovation project, employees were exposed to 12 foot fall hazard while working from an ice covered roof with the safety monitor system in use and the employees did not know the safety monitor duties or responsibilities. |
|
|
|
338007818
|
0111500
|
2012-12-18
|
815 EAST MAIN STREET, WATERBURY, CT, 06702
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-12-18
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-04-08
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 C |
| Issuance Date |
2013-02-07 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-06 |
| Current Penalty |
1100.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-03-07 |
| Nr Instances |
10 |
| Nr Exposed |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees were adequately trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways, procedures and methods which should be used in order to prevent these hazards. |
|
|
|
334800802
|
0111500
|
2012-06-20
|
30 HOWARD ST., WATERBURY, CT, 06705
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-06-20
|
| Emphasis |
N: CTARGET, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2013-07-16
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
480858 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-08-06 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-08-27 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-07 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet 6 inches above the ground while working on the 8 in 12 pitch roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-08-06 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-08-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3080.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-07 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite: The extension ladders that were used to gain access to the roof at heights of up to approximately 27 feet above the ground did not have their side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-08-06 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-08-13 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6160.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-09-07 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
7 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502. Worksite: The employees who were working on the 8 in 12 pitch roof with an eave height of approximately 25 feet 6 inches above the ground were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems. Diamond, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 311782510, citation number 1, item number 4, issued on 12/3/2009 with respect to a workplace located at 115 Spencer St., Winsted, CT and became a final order on 12/21/2009. |
|
|
