Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2017-03-17
|
Emphasis |
L: R1NOISE, N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2019-09-10
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
1190325 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
8149.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Lead Wave Solder Area: On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for required respirator use during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to use respiratory protection during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not ensure that employees required to use respiratory protection during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine passed a fit test prior to use. |
|
Citation ID |
01001D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 K01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not provide respiratory protection training for required respirator use during set up and operation of the lead wave solder machine. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100213 I01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
4075.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.213(i)(1): Non-working portion(s) of the blade of bandsaw(s) were not enclosed or guarded: Maintenance room; On or about 3/22/17, the vertical wood bandsaw, located in the corner of the maintenance room, did not have an enclosure or guard on approximately 10-12 inches of the unused portion of the blade. |
|
Citation ID |
01003A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11408.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, an employee working in the wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL of 0.05 mg/m3. The employee performed tasks such as skimming lead dross off the pot, pouring the dross into the waste bucket and processing circuit boards through the machine. |
|
Citation ID |
01003B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead : Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, an employee working in the wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL of 0.05 mg/m3. The employee performed tasks such as skimming lead dross off the pot, pouring the dross into the waste bucket and processing circuit boards through the machine. The wave solder machine is exhausted, however tasks such as cleaning the dross, carrying the open container and pouring it into the waste bucket are not. |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E03 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, the employer did not have a written lead compliance program, indicating engineering and work practice controls implemented to reduce exposures to or below the PEL. A worker in the lead wave solder area was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL. |
|
Citation ID |
01005 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F03 I C |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(3)(i)(C): The employer did not provide HEPA filters for powered and non-powered air-purifying respirators: Lead Wave Solder Area: On or about 3/22/17, an employee performing tasks that resulted in an 8-hr TWA exposure to lead of 0.2711 mg/m3, 5.4 times the PEL, was not provided respiratory protection with a HEPA filter. P95 filtering facepiece masks were provided. |
|
Citation ID |
01006 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
8149.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, employees working in the wave solder area were not provided adequate personal protective work clothing and equipment where the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed. |
|
Citation ID |
01007 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6519.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, employees working in the lead wave solder area were not provided a change room. When working in this area an employee was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times over the PEL. Employees wore street clothes and shoes with a smock for product protection. |
|
Citation ID |
01008 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, employees exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, 5.4 times in excess of the PEL, were not required to shower at the end of their work shift. |
|
Citation ID |
01009 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): 29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): The employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who are or may be exposed at or above the action level for more than 30 days per year: Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/22/17, the employer had not provided medical surveillance to employees performing tasks that may be exposed at or above the action level. An employee working on the lead wave solder machine was exposed to an 8-hr TWA of 0.2711 mg/m3 of lead, which is 5.4 times the PEL. |
|
Citation ID |
01010 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-11-10 |
Current Penalty |
8149.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
8 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: Lead Wave Solder Area and Touch Up Area; On or about 3/22/17, training in the requirements of 29 CFR Sec. 1910.1025 was not provided to employees working in the lead wave solder area and employees working in the touch-up area when they used lead solder and a solder iron the hand solder parts on circuit boards where the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100145 C02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-06-09 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-07-27 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-07-05 |
Final Order |
2017-12-27 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
8 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.145(c)(2): A caution sign was not used to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices. Lead Wave Solder Area; On or about 3/17/17, a caution sign was not posted to warn against the burn hazard near the lead pot that is heated to approximately 621 degrees fahrenheit. |
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2017-03-24
|
Case Closed |
2019-04-23
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
1187462 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100147 C04 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
4889.4 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: Company: On, or about, March 10, 2017, the Lockout/Tagout Procedure 90-21 did not include specific procedures for multiple energy sources machines, such as, but not limited to, stencil cleaning machines. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100333 B02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): While an employee was exposed to contact with parts of fixed electric equipment or circuits which were deenergized, the circuits energizing the parts were not locked out or tagged or both in accordance with the requirements o-f this paragraph (b) of 29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2): Wave Wash Room: On, or about, February 24, 2017, the circuit breaker provided on the GE Flex-a-Plug mounted on the overhead buss bar was not locked out when the new receptacle project was completed by the Floor Manager. In the alternative, the feed to the buss bar could have been de-energized and locked out. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100333 B02 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives: Company: On, or about, March 3, 2017, the company did not have either a copy of the OSHA standard or equivalent language in a safety program that included locking out of circuits and equipment and the use of test equipment to ensure that the equipment was properly de-energized. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100303 F02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
2933.4 |
Initial Penalty |
4889.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
107 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: On, or about, March 3, 2017, in the following locations, the purpose of branch circuits had not been provided on the following electrical equipment: A. Main Floor: A General Electric Flex-a-Plug that supplied power to the Wave Wash room. B. Main Electrical Room: An ITE 120/208 volt panelboard that contained five circuits in the on position. |
|
Citation ID |
01003A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100305 G01 IV A |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
2933.4 |
Initial Penalty |
4889.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: Wave Wash Room: On, or about, March 3, 2017, Type SJOOW cord was used to energize a wall mounted receptacle. The cord was used in lieu of permanent wiring. |
|
Citation ID |
01003B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100305 G01 IV D |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(D): Flexible cords and cables were used where attached to building surfaces: Wave Wash Room: On, or about, March 3, 2017, Type SJOOW cord was attached to the wall surface using plastic clips. |
|
Citation ID |
01004A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100332 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
4889.4 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Company: On, or about, February 24, 2017, employees who worked on or around electrical equipment had not been trained regarding what work practices and protective equipment were required to protect them against electric shock, arc flash and arc blast hazards while performing live trouble-shooting and verifying whether or not electrical equipment was properly de-energized. |
|
Citation ID |
01004B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100332 B02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(2): Employees, who were not qualified persons, were not trained in and familiar with any electrically related safety practices not specifically addressed by 29 CFR 1910.331 through 29 CFR 1910.335, but which were necessary for their safety: Company: On, or about, February 24, 2017, maintenance personnel who were not qualified to work on or around electrical equipment had not been provided with additional training regarding the inherent hazards of electricity such as high voltages, electric current, arcing, grounding and lack of guarding. |
|
Citation ID |
01004C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100333 A |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized: Company: On, or about, February 24, 2017, the employer had not developed and implemented Electrical Safety Related Work Practices to protect employees from electrical shock, burns, arc flash and arc blast hazards when working on or around electrical equipment in the plant. In additional to a lack of training and personal protective, employees were required to wear static dissipating ankle straps in order to prevent static that could damage circuit boards that were being manufactured. The static dissipating straps ensured a less resistive path to ground reducing the effectiveness of any insulating property of the employees shoes. Examples of safe work practices could include removing sensitive equipment from any work area to allow for employees to remove the ankle straps and/or the use insulating mats on the floor in the work area. |
|
Citation ID |
01004D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100335 A01 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Company: On, or about, February 24, 2017, personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, voltage rated gloves, fire resistive clothing, eye protection, face shields, hard hats and hearing protection were not provided to employees who performed live electrical work, including trouble-shooting, or who verified that electrical equipment was properly de-energized. Also, the ESD smock that was worn by all employees in the plant contained polyester, a meltable fabric. |
|
Citation ID |
01005A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100333 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
6844.8 |
Initial Penalty |
11408.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(1): Live parts to which an employee was exposed were not de-energized before the employee worked on or near them: Wave Wash Room: On, or about, February 24, 2017, an employee suffered serious electrical burns and shock when he attempted to attach a receptacle to a drop cord that had not been de-energized. |
|
Citation ID |
01005B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100333 B02 IV B |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(iv)(B): Before circuits or equipment was worked as de-energized, a qualified person did not use test equipment to test the circuit elements and electrical parts of equipment to which employees would be exposed and did not verify that the circuit elements and electrical parts were de-energized: Wave Wash Room: On, or about, February 24, 2017, the employer did not perform testing to ensure that a drop cord that was selected to energize a new receptacle was de-energized prior to an employee attempting working on the circuit. The employee suffered serious electrical burns and shock. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19040039 A02 |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
4889.4 |
Initial Penalty |
8149.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours: Company: On, or about, February 24, 2017, a temporary worker who was employed at the company as a Maintenance Technician suffered serious electrical burns and shock and was required to be hospitalized for at least two days. The incident was not reported to OSHA within 24 hours. |
|
Citation ID |
02002 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100303 B07 I |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(7)(i): Unused openings in boxes, raceways, auxiliary gutters, cabinets, equipment cases, or housings were not effectively closed to afford protection substantially equivalent to the wall of the equipment: Main Electrical Room: On, or about, March 6, 2017, an opening was left in the dead front of Panel A, an ITE 120/208 volt circuit breaker panel at position 33. |
|
Citation ID |
02003 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100303 G01 II |
Issuance Date |
2017-05-02 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-19 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2017-05-25 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage: Main Electrical Room: On, or about, March 3, 2017, items were stored on the floor in front of switches and panelboards, including an ITE 120/208 volt circuit breaker panel and Panel P6, a Square D circuit breaker panel. |
|
|