Peck's Tree Care & Landscaping LLC
Date of last update: 21 Apr 2025. Data updated weekly.
| Entity Name: | Peck's Tree Care & Landscaping LLC |
| Jurisdiction: | Connecticut |
| Legal type: | LLC |
| Citizenship: | Domestic |
| Status: | Active |
| Date Formed: | 30 Mar 2025 |
| Business ALEI: | 3186434 |
| Annual report due: | 31 Mar 2026 |
| Business address: | 240 Kings Road, Coventry, CT, 06238, United States |
| Mailing address: | 240 Kings Road, Coventry, CT, United States, 06238 |
| ZIP code: | 06238 |
| County: | Tolland |
| Place of Formation: | CONNECTICUT |
| E-Mail: | peckstreecareandlandscaping@gmail.com |
NAICS
561730 Landscaping ServicesThis industry comprises (1) establishments primarily engaged in providing landscape care and maintenance services and/or installing trees, shrubs, plants, lawns, or gardens and (2) establishments primarily engaged in providing these services along with the design of landscape plans and/or the construction (i.e., installation) of walkways, retaining walls, decks, fences, ponds, and similar structures. Learn more at the U.S. Census Bureau
| Name | Role | Business address | Phone | Residence address | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan Peck-Rizzo | Officer | 240 Kings Road, Coventry, CT, 06238, United States | +1 860-576-0198 | nathanpeckrizzo@icloud.com | 240 Kings Rd, Coventry, CT, 06238-3417, United States |
| Name | Role | Business address | Mailing address | Phone | Residence address | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan Peck-Rizzo | Agent | 240 Kings Road, Coventry, CT, 06238, United States | 240 Kings Road, Coventry, CT, 06238, United States | +1 860-576-0198 | nathanpeckrizzo@icloud.com | 240 Kings Rd, Coventry, CT, 06238-3417, United States |
| Filing number | Filing date | Effective date | Filing category | Filing type | Report year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF-0013358976 | 2025-03-30 | - | Business Formation | Certificate of Organization | - |
Sources: Company Profile on Connecticut's Official State Website
* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the dataset source should always be referred to for definitive information