Entity Name: | LAF Masonry & Landscaping LLC |
Jurisdiction: | Connecticut |
Legal type: | LLC |
Citizenship: | Domestic |
Status: | Active |
Sub status: | Ready for dissolution |
Date Formed: | 18 Jun 2023 |
Business ALEI: | 2806216 |
Annual report due: | 31 Mar 2024 |
Business address: | 115 Fort Hill Rd, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States |
Mailing address: | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, United States, 06776-3342 |
ZIP code: | 06776 |
County: | Litchfield |
Place of Formation: | CONNECTICUT |
E-Mail: | lguaillazaca@yahoo.com |
NAICS
238140 Masonry ContractorsThis industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in masonry work, stone setting, bricklaying, and other stone work. The work performed may include new work, additions, alterations, maintenance, and repairs. Learn more at the U.S. Census Bureau
Name | Role | Business address | Mailing address | Phone | Residence address | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Luis Guaillazaca | Agent | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States | +1 203-460-1272 | lguaillazaca@yahoo.com | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States |
Name | Role | Business address | Phone | Residence address | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kayla Guaillazaca Lata | Officer | - | - | - | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States |
Luis Guaillazaca | Officer | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States | +1 203-460-1272 | lguaillazaca@yahoo.com | 115 Fort Hill Rd, apt.1, New Milford, CT, 06776-3342, United States |
Filing number | Filing date | Effective date | Filing category | Filing type | Report year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BF-0011853272 | 2023-06-18 | - | Business Formation | Certificate of Organization | - |
BF-0011853277 | 2023-06-18 | 2023-06-18 | Change of NAICS Code | NAICS Code Change | - |
Sources: Company Profile on Connecticut's Official State Website
* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the dataset source should always be referred to for definitive information