Entity Name: | THE BEST ROOFERS LLC |
Jurisdiction: | Connecticut |
Legal type: | LLC |
Citizenship: | Domestic |
Status: | Active |
Sub status: | Annual report due |
Date Formed: | 06 Jul 2020 |
Business ALEI: | 1349863 |
Annual report due: | 31 Mar 2026 |
Business address: | 24 NELSON AVE, WATERBURY, CT, 06705, United States |
Mailing address: | 24 NELSON AVE, 1 FL, WATERBURY, CT, United States, 06705 |
ZIP code: | 06705 |
County: | New Haven |
Place of Formation: | CONNECTICUT |
E-Mail: | rosario.batista@muniinsurance.com |
NAICS
238160 Roofing ContractorsThis industry comprises establishments primarily engaged in roofing. This industry also includes establishments treating roofs (i.e., spraying, painting, or coating) and installing skylights. The work performed may include new work, additions, alterations, maintenance, and repairs. Learn more at the U.S. Census Bureau
Name | Role |
---|---|
MUNI TAX INC | Agent |
Name | Role | Business address | Residence address |
---|---|---|---|
MIGUEL A. TADAY-ZHAGNAY | Officer | 24 NELSON AVE, 1 FL, WATERBURY, CT, 06705, United States | 2 CARMEN ST, WATERBURY, CT, 06706, United States |
Credential | Credential type | Status | Status reason | Issue date | Effective date | Expiration date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC.0658989 | HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR | ACTIVE | CURRENT | 2020-07-08 | 2024-04-01 | 2025-03-31 |
Filing number | Filing date | Effective date | Filing category | Filing type | Report year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BF-0013132831 | 2025-03-17 | - | Annual Report | Annual Report | - |
BF-0012369723 | 2024-03-05 | - | Annual Report | Annual Report | - |
BF-0012482824 | 2023-12-06 | 2023-12-06 | Interim Notice | Interim Notice | - |
BF-0011365035 | 2023-03-08 | - | Annual Report | Annual Report | - |
BF-0010848469 | 2023-03-08 | - | Annual Report | Annual Report | - |
BF-0009782612 | 2023-03-07 | - | Annual Report | Annual Report | - |
0006941365 | 2020-07-06 | 2020-07-06 | Business Formation | Certificate of Organization | - |
Inspection Nr | Report ID | Date Opened | Site Address | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
345283170 | 0112000 | 2021-04-30 | 529-595 CHURCHHILL DRIVE, NEWINGTON, CT, 06111 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Type | Complaint |
Activity Nr | 1763283 |
Safety | Yes |
Violation Items
Citation ID | 01001 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date | 2021-09-17 |
Current Penalty | 2867.2 |
Initial Penalty | 4096.0 |
Final Order | 2022-01-13 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 3 |
Gravity | 10 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about April 30, 2021 at the Churchhill Drive Re-roofing project, employee were ripping off the old shingles from the roof deck and no fall protection system was in use. |
Citation ID | 01002 |
Citaton Type | Serious |
Standard Cited | 19261053 B01 |
Issuance Date | 2021-09-17 |
Current Penalty | 2048.2 |
Initial Penalty | 2926.0 |
Final Order | 2022-01-13 |
Nr Instances | 1 |
Nr Exposed | 4 |
Gravity | 5 |
FTA Current Penalty | 0.0 |
Citation text line | 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about April 30, 2021 at the Churchhill Drive Re-roofing Project, employees were using an extension ladder to access the roof deck and the ladder did not extend 3 feet past the roof deck landing. |
Sources: Company Profile on Connecticut's Official State Website
* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the dataset source should always be referred to for definitive information