|
342273331
|
0111500
|
2017-04-24
|
107-109 CHERRY CIRCLE LANE, PROSPECT, CT, 06712
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2017-04-24
|
| Emphasis |
L: RESCON, L: FALL, P: RESCON
|
| Case Closed |
2022-03-16
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D15 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-05-24 |
| Current Penalty |
2050.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2988.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee. Worksite: The single anchorage point that was used to attach the employees personal fall arrest system was not installed in a manner that would support at least 5000 pounds. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-05-24 |
| Current Penalty |
5800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
8366.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was engaged in residential construction activities from the residential roof was protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system. Juan Acero Construction, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1015425, Citation Number 1, Item Number 2a, issued on 02/23/2015 with respect to a workplace located at Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT and became a final order on 10/02/2015. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-05-24 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-06-20 |
| Current Penalty |
4150.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5976.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-06-16 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while engaged in residential construction activities from the roof at a height above 6 feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. \ Juan Acero Construction, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1) which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1015425, Citation Number 1, Item Number 2b, issued on 2/23/2015 with respect to a workplace located at Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT and became a final order on 10/02/2015. |
|
|
|
340154251
|
0111500
|
2014-12-04
|
OAK BRANCH DRIVE BUILDING 9, BROOKFIELD, CT, 06804
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Referral
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-12-04
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, L: EISAX30, L: EISAOF
|
| Case Closed |
2018-02-22
|
Related Activity
| Type |
Inspection |
| Activity Nr |
1015577 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
| Type |
Referral |
| Activity Nr |
928691 |
| Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260025 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-02-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-03-03 |
| Current Penalty |
1120.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas: Location: Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT Protruding nails were present on the walking and working surface of the residential pitched roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-02-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-03-03 |
| Current Penalty |
1960.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2800.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT An adequate fall protection system was not being utilized on the steep pitch roof, with an eve to ground height of approximately 29 feet 2 inches, while employees were performing roofing work. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-02-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT The employer did not ensure that all employees had been adequately trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize and/or eliminate those hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2015-02-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-03-05 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Location: Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT The Werner 40 foot aluminum extension ladder did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261060 A |
| Issuance Date |
2015-02-23 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2015-03-12 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2015-10-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Location: Oak Branch Drive, Building 9, Brookfield, CT The employer did not ensure that all employees had been adequately trained in the hazards associated with ladders and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize the hazards. |
|
|
