341688182
|
0111500
|
2016-08-11
|
66-74 LEDGEBROOK DRIVE, NORWALK, CT, 06855
|
|
Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2016-08-11
|
Emphasis |
L: EISAOF, L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2017-11-08
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
1122421 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1169832 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19261101 K05 II B |
Issuance Date |
2016-11-23 |
Abatement Due Date |
2016-12-29 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2672.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-06-08 |
Final Order |
2017-11-15 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
2 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(5)(ii)(B): The sample collection was not conducted by a competent person, accredited inspector or by a certified industrial hygienist: Location: 16 Building, 66-74 Ledgebrook Lane, Norwalk, CT 06855 A competent person, accredited inspector or a Certified Industrial Hygienist was not assigned and used to collect roofing material samples. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19030019 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2017-02-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-03-06 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
305.0 |
Contest Date |
2017-06-08 |
Final Order |
2017-11-15 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: Building 16 - Ledgebrook Drive Norwalk, CT 06855 Certification and documentation for Citation 01, Items 01a, was not received with in 10 days calendar days (by January 9, 2017) after the abatement due date of (December 29, 2016). |
|
|
340073436
|
0111500
|
2014-11-07
|
130 OLCOTT WAY BLDGS. 34-41, RIDGEFIELD, CT, 06877
|
|
Inspection Type |
Planned
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2014-11-07
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL, N: FEDTARG 2015, P: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2017-05-01
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1008032 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
Issuance Date |
2014-12-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-12-22 |
Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
5600.0 |
Final Order |
2015-01-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employees who were working from the residential roof at height above six feet were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems. Ricks Main Roofing, LTD was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 569219, citation number 1, item number 2a, issued on 9/21/2012 with respect to a workplace located at 1 Regent St., Norwalk, CT and became a final order on 10/9/2012. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-12-10 |
Abatement Due Date |
2015-01-07 |
Current Penalty |
2700.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4000.0 |
Final Order |
2015-01-08 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards above six feet while working from the residential roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. Ricks Main Roofing, LTD was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 569219, citation number 1, item number 2b, issued on 9/21/2012 with respect to a workplace located at 1 Regent St., Norwalk, CT and became a final order on 10/9/2012. |
|
|
335692190
|
0111500
|
2012-07-19
|
1 REGENT STREET, NORWALK, CT, 06855
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2012-07-19
|
Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
Case Closed |
2013-04-05
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
572051 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-04 |
Current Penalty |
952.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1360.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Jobsite: The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program in place for employees who were required to wear half-face respirators. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-04 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-03-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Jobsite: The employer did not have employees who were required to wear a respirator go through a medical evaluation prior to wearing the respirator. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 F01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-04 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-03-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103) Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that employees were given and passed either a qualitative or quantitative fit test for those employees required to wear a respirator. |
|
Citation ID |
01001D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100134 K |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-01-04 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2013-03-04 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (Construction Reference 1926.103) Jobsite: The employer did not provide employees who were required to wear a respirator with comprehensive, understandable training. |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Current Penalty |
1190.0 |
Initial Penalty |
1700.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: Employees performing roofing work on a flat roof, with approximate heights of up to10 feet from edge to ground, were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19260503 A02 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-21 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-05 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Jobsite: Employees required to perform roofing work not receive appropriate training by a competent person who was qualified in knowledge and implementation of OSHA roofing safety requirements to allow employees to understand the hazards associated with roofing work and to take steps to mitigate those hazards. |
|
|