Search icon

PASCACK BUILDERS, INC.

Branch
Date of last update: 21 Apr 2025. Data updated weekly.

Company Details

Entity Name: PASCACK BUILDERS, INC.
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Legal type: Stock
Citizenship: Foreign
Status: Revoked
Date Formed: 30 Jan 2001
Branch of: PASCACK BUILDERS, INC., RHODE ISLAND (Company Number 000011485)
Business ALEI: 0672489
Annual report due: 30 Jan 2020
Business address: 445 CALLAHAN ROAD, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI, 02852, United States
Mailing address: 445 CALLAHAN ROAD, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI, United States, 02852
Place of Formation: RHODE ISLAND
E-Mail: kshea@pascackbuilders.com

Industry & Business Activity

NAICS

236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

This industry comprises establishments primarily responsible for the construction (including new work, additions, alterations, maintenance, and repairs) of commercial and institutional buildings and related structures, such as stadiums, grain elevators, and indoor swimming facilities. This industry includes establishments responsible for the on-site assembly of modular or prefabricated commercial and institutional buildings. Included in this industry are commercial and institutional building general contractors, commercial and institutional building for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building design-build firms, and commercial and institutional building project construction management firms. Learn more at the U.S. Census Bureau

Agent

Name Role Business address E-Mail
Secretary of State Agent 165 Capitol Ave., P.O. BOX 150470, Hartford, CT, 06115-0470, United States kshea@pascackbuilders.com

Officer

Name Role Business address Residence address
MARK SHOVLIN Officer 445 CALLAHAN RD, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI, 02852, United States 135 WESTMORELAND STREET, NARRAGANSETT, RI, 02882, United States
DAN SHOVLIN Officer 445 CALLAHAN RD, NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI, 02852, United States 7 HILL AVE., SMITHFIELD, RI, United States

Filing

Filing number Filing date Effective date Filing category Filing type Report year
BF-0012037598 2023-10-30 - Administrative Dissolution Certificate of Dissolution/Revocation -
BF-0011897283 2023-07-25 - Administrative Dissolution Notice of Intent to Dissolve/Revoke -
0006810585 2020-03-04 - Annual Report Annual Report 2019
0006333391 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2018
0006333340 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2014
0006333354 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2015
0006333374 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2016
0006333335 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2013
0006333382 2019-01-23 - Annual Report Annual Report 2017
0004517187 2012-02-01 - Annual Report Annual Report 2012

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
340681584 0112000 2015-06-04 1666 CONNECTICUT 12, LEDYARD, CT, 06338
Inspection Type Planned
Scope Complete
Safety/Health Safety
Close Conference 2015-06-04
Emphasis L: EISAOF, L: FALL, P: FALL
Case Closed 2015-07-24

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260404 B01 II
Issuance Date 2015-07-08
Current Penalty 800.0
Initial Penalty 1600.0
Final Order 2015-08-01
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(ii): On a construction site, where an assured equipment grounding program was not utilized, all 120-volt, single-phase, 15 and 20 ampere receptacle outlets which were not a part of the permanent wiring of the building or structure and which are in use by employees did not have approved ground fault circuit interrupers for personal protection. a) 1666 Connecticut 12, Ledyard, CT. Job Site - On or about 6-4-15 - Employees were exposed to electrical burn hazards from 50 foot extension cords connecting power tools that were not equipped with GFCI's in the system.
Citation ID 01002
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260453 B02 V
Issuance Date 2015-07-08
Current Penalty 1000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2015-08-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: a) 1666 Connecticut 12, Ledyard, CT. - On or about 6-4-15 - Employee was observed working in an S-40 4X4 aerial lift removing rotted wood on the eave of the building with his fall protection system not tied to the lift. Employee was not tied off in the lift basket exposing him to a eight to ten foot fall.
Citation ID 01003A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260502 D16 III
Issuance Date 2015-07-08
Current Penalty 1000.0
Initial Penalty 2000.0
Final Order 2015-08-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: a) 1666 Connecticut 12, Ledyard, CT. - On or about 6-4-15 - Employee was working from an aerial lift approximately eight to ten feet above the ground using a rip stitch lanyard for fall protection which would allow contact with the ground or a lower level.
Citation ID 01003B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19260503 A02
Issuance Date 2015-07-08
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Final Order 2015-08-01
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) a) 1666 Connecticut 12, Ledyard, CT. Job Site - On or about 6-4-15 - Employee was using a six foot rip stitch type lanyard for fall protection while working in an aerial lift. The proper lanyard is a short lanyard or retractable type to keep employees in the basket of the aerial lift.
See something incorrect or outdated? Let us know

Sources: Company Profile on Connecticut's Official State Website

* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the dataset source should always be referred to for definitive information