|
339847196
|
0111500
|
2014-07-09
|
2520 WHITNEY AVENUE, HAMDEN, CT, 06518
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2014-07-09
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, P: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2017-11-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-28 |
| Current Penalty |
800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1320.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: JOBSITE: The employer had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Decoplast Genova Finish. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: JOBSITE: The employer did not provide training and information for Hazard Communication program for the employees required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Decoplast Genova Finish. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260502 D16 III |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-14 |
| Current Penalty |
1400.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2200.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: JOBSITE: The fullbody harness and lanyard with deceleration device were rigged in such a manner that the employee could have more than six (6) feet free fall to the lower level, and/or also contact the ground. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-28 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: JOBSITE: The employee exposed to the hazard of falling while working on a roof to install stucco, was not provided training and information to recognize and minimize such hazards. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2014-10-01 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2014-10-14 |
| Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4400.0 |
| Final Order |
2014-10-30 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. JOBSITE: The employee installing stucco on the eave of a roof 6 ft. above the ground was not protected from falling by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means. Kelby Stucco was previously cited for a violation of an equivalent occupational safety and health standard {29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)}, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 425371, citation number 01, item number 004a and was affirmed as a final order on 07/02/2012, with respect to a workplace located at 33 Business Park Drive, Branford, CT 06405. |
|
|
|
334253713
|
0111500
|
2012-05-03
|
33 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, BRANFORD, CT, 06405
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Other
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-05-03
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2014-09-17
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1250.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
4 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii). The following scaffold platforms, from which emplpoyees were engaged in construction activities, were not fully planked: A. West Side Scaffold: 1. The single 18 3/4 inch wide platform used as a walking/working surface on the top of the second stage scaffold frame 13 feet 7 inches above the ground. 2. The two 18 3/4 inch wide platforms used as a walking/working surface on top of the first stage scaffold frame 7 feet 4 inches above the ground. B. East Side Scaffold: 1. The single 18 3/4 inch wide platform used as a walking/working surface on the top of the second stage scaffold frame 13 feet 10 inches above the ground. 2. The single 18 3/4 inch wide platform used as a walking/working surface on the top of the stage scaffold frame 7 feet 7 inches above the ground. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E06 VI |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(6)(vi): Integral prefabricated scaffold access frames did not have a maximum spacing between rungs of 16 3/4 inches (43 cm). Non-uniform rung spacing caused by joining end frames together is allowed, provided the spacing does not exceed 16 3/4 inches (43 cm). Jobsite: The spaces between the integral prefabricated scaffold rungs used to access the scaffold platforms on the east and west side scaffolds were 18 3/4 inches apart. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 F07 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-22 |
| Current Penalty |
750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Jobsite: The three stage high tubular welded frame scaffolds, erected on the following locations, were not erected under the direction and supervision of a competent personal qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: 1. The scaffold erected on the west side of the establishment's entrance. 2. The scaffold erected on the east side of the establishment's entrance. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1250.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to a lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Jobsite: Employees, engaged in construction activities on scaffold platforms, were not protected from fall hazards by the use of appropriate fall protection systems, devices or equivalent: 1. The 18 3/4 inch wide scaffold platform on the west side scaffold with a 13 foot 7 inch fall distance. 2. The 18 3/4 inch wide scaffold platform on the east side scaffold with 13 foot 10 inch fall distance. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E05 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(5)(i): Ramps and walkways 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels did not have guardrail systems that comply with subpart M of this part -- Fall Protection: Jobsite: The 19 inch wide, 9 foot 8 inch long walking/working surface spanning between the east and west side tubular welded frame scaffolds and having a 14 foot fall distance was not equipped a guardrail system. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-22 |
| Current Penalty |
750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1200.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Jobsite: Each employee performing work while on a tubular welded frame scaffolds was not provided with training by a person qualified in scaffolding to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffolding being used and the procedures/means to control and/or minimize the hazards associated with the scaffold. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B04 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Current Penalty |
1250.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Jobsite: The 6-foot aluminum stepladder was used in the closed position and leaned against the exterior brick siding of the structure to gain access to roof of the building. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261060 A |
| Issuance Date |
2012-06-22 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2012-07-22 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2012-07-02 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: A training program was not developed and implemented to train each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and to train employees in the procedures to minimize or eliminate those hazards. |
|
|
|
123287518
|
0111500
|
2011-05-10
|
1182 NEW HAVEN ROAD (RTE 63), NAUGATUCK, CT, 06770
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2011-05-10
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL, S: COMMERCIAL CONSTR, S: FALL FROM HEIGHT
|
| Case Closed |
2013-10-29
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-05 |
| Current Penalty |
2350.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4200.0 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-05 |
| Current Penalty |
1650.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
05 |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2011-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-05 |
| Current Penalty |
2350.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4200.0 |
| Nr Instances |
3 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260454 A |
| Issuance Date |
2011-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-14 |
| Current Penalty |
1650.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
05 |
|
|
|
109175604
|
0111500
|
2006-06-06
|
930 RTE 5, WALLINGFORD, CT, 06492
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Prog Related
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2006-06-06
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2007-07-11
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Repeat |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2006-08-04 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2006-08-23 |
| Current Penalty |
3000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
|
|
|
123289902
|
0111500
|
2003-07-17
|
ELI"S RESTAURANT SCHOOL ST., HAMDEN, CT, 06514
|
|
| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2003-07-17
|
| Emphasis |
S: CONSTRUCTION, L: FALL
|
| Case Closed |
2003-08-13
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 B01 |
| Issuance Date |
2003-07-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2003-09-15 |
| Current Penalty |
300.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
600.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
02 |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 C02 II |
| Issuance Date |
2003-07-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2003-09-15 |
| Current Penalty |
750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1500.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 D03 |
| Issuance Date |
2003-07-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2003-09-15 |
| Current Penalty |
300.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
600.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
02 |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260451 G01 VII |
| Issuance Date |
2003-07-29 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2003-09-15 |
| Current Penalty |
750.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1500.0 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
10 |
|
|
