Search icon

CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION

Branch
Date of last update: 28 Apr 2025. Data updated weekly.

Company Details

Entity Name: CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION
Jurisdiction: Connecticut
Legal type: Stock
Citizenship: Foreign
Status: Revoked
Date Formed: 25 Sep 1981
Branch of: CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION, NEW YORK (Company Number 258234)
Business ALEI: 0122766
Mailing address: ONE MEDIA CROSSWAYS, WOODBURY, CT, 11797
Place of Formation: NEW YORK

Agent

Name Role Business address Residence address
ROBERT P KNICKERBOCKER JR Agent ONE CONSTITUTION PLAZA, HARTFORD, CT, 06103, United States 284 FARMCLIFF DR, GLASTONBURY, CT, 06033, United States

History

Type Old value New value Date of change
Name change CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION 1986-03-17

Filing

Filing number Filing date Effective date Filing category Filing type Report year
0000126386 1990-03-30 - Administrative Dissolution Certificate of Dissolution/Revocation -
0000126385 1989-10-06 - Administrative Dissolution Notice of Intent to Dissolve/Revoke -
0000981443 1986-03-17 - Amendment Amend Name -
0000126374 1981-09-25 - Business Registration Certificate of Authority -

Court Cases

This table provides a quick overview of court view cases, including key information like the Title, filing date, current status, and a link of each case.

Docket Number Title Date Case Type Status Open
AC 36213 JUAN MORENO v. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION ET AL. 2013-10-25 Appeal Case Disposed View Case

Court Cases Opinions

This table contains information about court case opinions. It includes details like the case name, court, date, and summary of the court's decision.

Package ID Category Cause Nature Of Suit
USCOURTS-ctd-3_21-cv-00522 Judicial Publications 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination Civil Rights Employment
Collection United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc JU 4.15
Court Type District
Court Name United States District Court District of Connecticut
Circuit 2nd
Office Location New Haven
Case Type civil

Parties

Name Optimum
Role Defendant
Name Altice Technical Services
Role Defendant
Name Altice USA
Role Defendant
Name CSC Holdings, LLC
Role Defendant
Name CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION
Role Defendant
Name OPTIMUM CORPORATION
Role Defendant
Name JOSE GARCIA LLC
Role Plaintiff

Opinions

Opinion ID USCOURTS-ctd-3_21-cv-00522-0
Date 2023-01-03
Notes ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, the Court GRANTS the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #39). The Clerk of Court shall close this case and shall close Garcia v. Altice Technical Services US, LLC, 21-cv-01002, with which this case was consolidated. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 1/3/23. (Heavenrich, S.)
View View File
USCOURTS-ctd-3_24-cv-00541 Judicial Publications 28:1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination Civil Rights Employment
Collection United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc JU 4.15
Court Type District
Court Name United States District Court District of Connecticut
Circuit 2nd
Office Location New Haven
Case Type civil

Parties

Name Altice Technical Services US
Role Defendant
Name Altice USA
Role Defendant
Name CSC Holdings, LLC
Role Defendant
Name CABLEVISION SYSTEMS SERVICES CORPORATION
Role Defendant
Name Angel Rivera
Role Plaintiff

Opinions

Opinion ID USCOURTS-ctd-3_24-cv-00541-0
Date 2025-02-25
Notes ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court grants the Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22). The Court grants Rivera leave to file an amended complaint if he so chooses on or before March 25, 2025. Defendants' motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 52) is granted. Discovery will be stayed until further order of the Court terminating the stay. Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 02/25/2025. (Urban, N.)
View View File
See something incorrect or outdated? Let us know

Sources: Company Profile on Connecticut's Official State Website

* While we strive to keep this information correct and up-to-date, it is not the primary source, and the dataset source should always be referred to for definitive information