| Collection |
United States Courts Opinions
|
| SuDoc |
JU 4.15
|
| Court Type |
District
|
| Court Name |
United States District Court District of Connecticut
|
| Circuit |
2nd
|
| Office Location |
New Haven
|
| Case Type |
civil
|
Parties
| Name |
Anne Clegg
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Abe Gallis
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Rajesh Karnani
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Chana Krinsky
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Aleta Lilly
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Longmeadow Farm LLC
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Ben Knox Miller
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Joel B Nice
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Bernadette A Ray
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Joanna Reslink
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Menachem Shemtov
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Noah Wells
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Bluetriton Brands Holdings, Inc.
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Enterprise Maggi SA
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
NESTLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Nestle SA
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
BLUETRITON BRANDS, INC.
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Nestle Waters SAS
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
San Pelligrino SpA
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Triton Water Holdings
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Triton Water Intermediate
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Triton Water Parent
|
| Role |
Defendant
|
|
| Name |
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
|
| Role |
Interested Party
|
|
| Name |
Diane Bogdan
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Jennifer S. Cole
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Benjamin A. Fletcher
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Julie Harding
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Heather Harrigan
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Bridget Kopet
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Tina Moretti
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Catherine Porter
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Erica Russell
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Stephen S. Shapiro
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Alan H. Nevas
|
| Role |
Special Master
|
|
| Name |
Mark J. Patane
|
| Role |
Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Pareshkumar Brahmbhatt
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Fun Cheung
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Joseph Epstein
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Susan Fisher
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Jessica Marie Bartling
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
| Name |
Michael Brown
|
| Role |
Consol Plaintiff
|
|
Opinions
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-0
|
| Date |
2018-05-18
|
| Notes |
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons stated in the attached ruling, Nestle's motion to dismiss (Doc. # 53 ) is GRANTED, and the following complaints are dismissed: Patane v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01381, Krinsky v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01474, Lilly v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 17-cv-01566, and Brown v. Nestle Waters North America, Inc., 3:17-cv-01746. This ruling is without prejudice to plaintiffs' filing of amended complaints within 30 days that state any proper claims not preempted by federal law. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/18/2018. (Zuckier, C.) Modified on 5/18/2018 (Gutierrez, Y.).
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-1
|
| Date |
2019-03-28
|
| Notes |
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. For the reasons set forth inthe attached ruling, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #164) is GRANTED in part as to plaintiffs' Vermont law claims but DENIED as to all other claims. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/28/2019. (Sokoloff-Rubin, E.)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-2
|
| Date |
2020-08-12
|
| Notes |
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. #219). For the reasons set forth in the attached opinion, the Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment (Doc. #219) as to Count VIII (Rhode Island Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim) and DENIES the motion for summary judgment as to all other claims. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/12/2020. (Al-Jarani, Y.)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-3
|
| Date |
2022-02-04
|
| Notes |
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 323 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS the motion for summary judgment on the plaintiffs' CUTPA claim (Count Six) to the extent of liability for sales occurring before August 15, 2014. The Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment in all other respects. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/4/22. (Brooks, E.)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-4
|
| Date |
2022-02-28
|
| Notes |
ORDER. For the reasons set forth in detail on the record in a discovery conference/hearing conducted on February 22, 2022, and for those reasons set forth in hearings, of which there are transcripts docketed, conducted on June 24, 2021 (ECF No. 344), July 7, 2021 (ECF No. 334), October 25, 2021 (ECF No. 381) and January 27, 2022 (ECF No. 407), which are incorporated by reference, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, ECF No. 307, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Cour's standard of review, findings and conclusions are summarized in the attached Order. Defendant shall produce the designated categories of documents ordered to be produced by the Court by April 25, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge S. Dave Vatti on 2/28/2022. (Arroyo, Alexandra)
|
| View |
View File
|
|
| Opinion ID |
USCOURTS-ctd-3_17-cv-01381-5
|
| Date |
2024-12-30
|
| Notes |
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. For the reasons set forth in the attached ruling, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Nestle's motion for summary judgment (Doc.#608). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/30/2024. (Urban, N. ) Modified on 12/30/2024 (Lewis, D).
|
| View |
View File
|
|
|
