| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Complete
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2012-12-14
|
| Emphasis |
N: AMPUTATE, P: AMPUTATE, L: FORKLIFT
|
| Case Closed |
2013-02-19
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 C06 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: Building 3, Batch Plant: On or about December 14, 2012, the employer had not conducted annual inspections of the energy control procedure for the main batch conveyor. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 C07 I |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The training program of the employer did not include all the training elements listed under Items A-C of 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): Building 3, Batch Plant: On or about December 14, 2012, the employer had not documented that authorized or affected employees had been trained in the elements of the company's lockout/tagout procedures. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: Building 3, Batch Plant: On or about December 14, 2012, moving portions on the underside of the main batch conveyor which were less than 8 feet from the ground were not guarded to prevent accidental contact. Reference: ANSI B20.1-1993 |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100303 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: Building 3, Batch Plant: On or about December 14, 2012, access to the 480V electrical main panel for the batch conveyor was blocked by the storage of palletized anchor bolts and chemical containers. |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100304 A02 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
14 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2): Grounded conductors were attached to terminals or leads so as to reverse designated polarity: Building 2, Break Room: On or about December 14, 2012, employees were exposed to electric shock hazards from a Sharp Carousel II microwave oven which was powered through an outlet with reversed polarity. In this condition, equipment which is turned off is still energized. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100304 G05 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
2000.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
14 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: Building 2, Break Room: On or about December 14, 2012, employees were exposed to electric shock hazards from the energized metal parts of the Pepsi vending machine. The equipment was not grounded and the cordset did not have a grounding pin. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
800.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
1600.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
14 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility-wide: On or about December 14, 2012, the employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program to notify employees of the chemical hazards to which they were exposed, from ready-mix concrete and chemical admixtures. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Other |
| Standard Cited |
19100132 D02 |
| Issuance Date |
2012-12-20 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2013-02-08 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2013-01-08 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
14 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about December 14, 2012, the employer had not certified that a hazard assessment had been completed to determine the type of personal protective equipment required. |
|
|
